Skip to content Back to top
 

FOI 2026/1813

Reference FOI 2026/1813
Description GP Prescribing scheme
Date Requested 09/06/2026
Date Replied 22/06/2026
Category Primary Care & Strategic Commissioning

I am enquiring about the details of any prescribing quality scheme/ prescribing incentive scheme you have in place for financial year 2026/27 between your Integrated Care Board and your member GP practices within your area. Can you please provide the following information if possible:

  1. When does the scheme run from and when does it end
  2. What does the GP practice need to do to achieve as part of the scheme
  3. What elements are within the scheme – can you be specific about the switches / reviews / medications included
  4. Which practices have agreed to the scheme
  5. What the payment is for the practice on achieving each element

Can you provide this information in electronic copy (Microsoft Word / Excel /PDF) under the Freedom of Information act and respond within the mandated timeframes please.

  1. 1st April 2026 to 31st March 2027
MO1: Antimicrobial Stewardship
Requirement 1 (Drivers for AMS):

• Nominate an AMS Champion.

• Participate in World AMR Awareness Week (WAAW).

• Submit a Quality Improvement (QI) plan with outcomes.

Requirement 2 (Reduction in total antibiotic prescribing):

• Reduction in overall antibiotic items per STAR-PU to ≤0.871.

The 12-month rolling figure on March 31st, 2027, will be compared to the baseline figure on March 31st, 2026, to calculate achievement.

Requirement 3 (Reduction in broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing and increased coding):   • The 12-month rolling figure on March 31st, 2027, for the proportion of antibiotics prescribed from broad spectrums (cephalosporins, co amoxiclav and quinolones) to be ≤10% AND

• ≥70% of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions issued between April 1st 2026 and March 31st 2027 must have a coded indication.

Requirement 4 (Antibiotic prescribing in Children 0-9 Years):

• Percentage of registered children aged 0–9 years prescribed ≥1 antibiotic in last 12 months ≤ 25% (national target) by March 31st, 2027,

MO2: Shared Care of Medicines
No submission: achievement assessed via data led KPIs

Core Requirements for GP Practices

Practices delivering this service must:

• Review and respond to new shared care of medicines requests within 14 days of receiving the request to confirm acceptance or refusal of shared care.

• Code all decisions (accepted, declined, or “accepted with concerns” *) using agreed SNOMED codes (see SNOMED code section) for new and historical shared care prescribing. • Maintain an up-to-date register of shared care patients.

• Ensure prescribing and monitoring are undertaken as per the relevant SCP requirements.

MO3: DOAC Optimisation
Annual DOAC Review No submission: achievement assessed via data led KPIs

1. Every patient using a DOAC should have at least annual monitoring (some individual patients will require more) which should include up to date: • Full blood count • Liver function tests • Urea and electrolytes • Serum creatinine (for creatinine clearance) • Weight (for creatinine clearance)

2. Contemporaneous Creatinine Clearance levels should be calculated using the MDCalc Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) and input into the patient notes within a maximum of 3 months following their creatinine results.

3. Once the CrCl score has been entered into the patient records by practice staff, the DOAC choice should be reviewed to ensure continued appropriateness against the CrCl score for each patient.

4. Use GMMMG document to guide changes based on CrCl levels DOAC-review of-NVAF-patients_FINAL_FOR_WEB-v1.0_SEPTEMBER-2024.pdf

5. All patients who are identified to not be on an optimal DOAC or dose following their CrCl calculation or due to a change in weight, should have their DOAC reviewed to ensure safe prescribing and be invited for a DOAC review – this is in line with safe prescribing guidance and in many practices often takes place via an annual review.

6. This annual DOAC review should be recorded on clinical system by using recording each of the elements • Full blood count • Liver function tests • Urea and electrolytes • Serum creatinine (for creatinine clearance) • Weight (for creatinine clearance) • Creatinine Clearance

Active switch to cost-effective DOAC No submission: achievement assessed via data led KPIs

7. In addition, where patients are not prescribed apixaban or rivaroxaban as their DOAC (so are prescribed Dabigatran or Edoxaban), these patients should be consulted about switching to apixaban or rivaroxaban. This can take place during their annual review or via a separate interaction to discuss a switch in medication. This discussion should be recorded in the clinical system using the following codes: • Treatment changed SNOMED CT: 445528004 • If patient declined the switch use: Drug declined by patient – alternative therapy SNOMED CT: 182901005 • If the review leads to a dose change: SNOMED CT: 1364161000000108 – Direct-acting oral anticoagulant dose changed (situation) • If the review is complete but nothing was changed, then: 1364181000000104 – Direct-acting oral anticoagulant dose not changed (situation)

8. The guidelines for DAOC switched are included here. Patients newly commencing on a DOAC should also be initiated on DOACs in line with these guidelines. DOAC-review-of-NVAF-patients_FINAL_FOR_WEB v1.0_SEPTEMBER-2024.pdf and GM’s commissioning statement.

MO4: Low Priority Prescribing
Review Prescribing of Low Priority Products No submission: achievement assessed via data led KPIs

Practices are required to:

• Review prescribing of Low Priority Products in line with NHS England » Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care: policy guidance and PrescQipp Low priority prescribing

• Use provided searches to identify patients prescribed LPP medicines.

• Undertake reviews, including shared decision-making discussions with patients where changes or deprescribing are indicated.

• Implement agreed actions to reduce, stop or switch LPP medicines to clinically appropriate alternatives where suitable

MO5: SaferPrescribingNeed
A two-fold delivery approach will be expected for this specification:

Practices will be expected to invite all patients from the GM SaferPrescribingNeed (SPN) Dashboard with “very high” and “high” unmet SaferPrescribingNeed scores and prioritise these cohorts for structured medicines reviews.

Practices will be expected to collaborate at a PCN level with other practices, wider primary care, community teams, voluntary sector partners and others to develop quality improvement plans* focusing on either a) or b) below.

The aim of the QI plan is to take a proactive approach through implementing coordinated population‑level interventions that prevent patients moving into higher unmet need cohorts and support sustainable reductions in harm across the PCN:

a. Polypharmacy and Anticholinergic Burden

b. Opioids and Dependence Forming Medication

100% of “very high” and “high” unmet population cohort to be invited to a Structured Medication Review

SMR completion for “very high” and “high” unmet need population cohort

Submission of PCN QI Plan – Quarter 1

Submission of QI Evaluation, Outcomes, Reflections and Supporting Evidence – Q4

Reductions in very high and high unmet need population cohorts

MO6: Tirzepatide Prescribing – Clinical Data Quality
Clinical coding and clinical audit No submission: achievement assessed via data led KPIs or practice level assurance discussion

1. Use of consistent clinical coding Practices should: – Retrospectively review patient records and ensure that relevant clinical coding associated with tirzepatide prescribing is accurate and complete (using practice-initiated searches) – Prospectively ensure that relevant clinical codes associated with tirzepatide prescribing are recorded appropriately by practice clinicians.

2.. Clinical audit Practices are asked to carry out a clinical audit in Quarter 2 2026/27 (July-September 2026). Searches will be provided for practices to support this. The aim of the clinical audit is to: • Identify any gaps in clinical coding and to address these through a clinical review of records and addition of appropriate codes (as outlined above) and • To identify any gaps in clinical care in relation to tirzepatide prescribing with appropriate clinical actions to address these

 

  1. See table above
  2. 100% of Greater Manchester practices are signed up to the BeCCoR scheme

5.

Element Payment / achievement basis
MO1 AMS Requirement 1: AMS leadership, WAAW and QI plan Maximum £0.30 per head of population. Requires AMS champion, WAAW participation, Q1 QI plan and Q4 QI plan with outcomes.
MO1 Requirement 2: Total antibiotic prescribing Maximum £0.30 per head of population. 100% if ≤0.871 items/STAR-PU. Sliding scale applies above this threshold.
MO1 Requirement 3: Broad-spectrum prescribing and coding Maximum £0.20 per head of population. Requires ≤10% broad-spectrum prescribing and ≥70% coded indication, or 80% reward if >10% but ≥10% reduction from baseline and coding target met.
MO1 Requirement 4: Antibiotic prescribing in children aged 0–9 Maximum £0.20 per head of population. 100% if ≤25%; 80% if above 25% but ≥10% reduction from baseline.
MO2 Shared Care of Medicines Cohort tariff based on medicine band: Band 1 £103.46, Band 1a £130.41, Band 2 £77.59, Band 2a £97.80, Band 3 £51.72, Band 3a £65.19, Band 4 £37.25, Band 4a £43.99 per patient per annum. Depot administration fee £10.71.

Payment will be based on coded shared care.

MO3 Annual DOAC review Practice earns funding based on its share of the GM DOAC cohort. Lower threshold 50% reviewed; upper threshold 80% reviewed. Below 50% = £0; 50% achievement = 50% funding; 80% achievement = 100% funding.
MO3 Active DOAC switch Applies to patients on edoxaban or dabigatran. Total GM funding £224,365, equivalent to approximately £21.68 per baseline edoxaban/dabigatran patient. Lower threshold 30%; upper Threshold = 70%. Below Lower Threshold payment is £0. At the Lower Threshold 30%, 50% of funding is payable (i.e. LT%+20%). Payment will rise in line with % of cohort reviews completed +20% up to 69.9% (i.e. at 69% achievement 89% funding is payable). At UT of 70%, 100% of funding is payable.
MO4 Low Priority Prescribing Engagement payment of £0.08 per weighted list size where practice does not increase LPP spend compared with baseline. Practices can also earn 30% of the cost reduction achieved between the 2025/26 baseline and 2026/27 measured period.
MO5 SaferPrescribingNeed £1.30 per invite for inviting the very high/high unmet need cohort for SMR. £25 per completed SMR. Reduction in very high cohort: £0.12 per head of population; high cohort: £0.25 per head of population, paid on a sliding scale up to 100% for a 10% reduction.
MO6 Tirzepatide clinical data quality Achievement is based on completion of coding/data-quality work and clinical audit. The scheme document does not specify a separate per-patient tariff for this element.

 

Return to FOI Requests

Launch Recite Me assistive technology